RIKEN Brain Science Institute (RIKEN BSI) RIKEN BSI News No. 11 (Feb. 2001)




Phase II of the Neuronal Function Research

Group Director, Neuronal Function Research Group
Dr. Takao K. Hensch


Much of what we know about neuronal function stems from the elegant, detailed investigation of single cells at the biophysical or molecular level. Yet, neurons only realize their full potential once they are "plugged" into circuits. During its first phase, the Neuronal Function Research Group at BSI established a unique focus upon the interface between cellular and systems neurobiology. This perspective yielded major advances in our understanding of olfactory (Drs. K. Mori, Y. Yoshihara), cerebellar (Drs. M. Kano, R. Yano), and visual processing (Dr. T.K. Hensch). Combining classical electrophysiological and anatomical techniques with modern molecular/genetic approaches has become the hallmark of our group. In the coming second phase, we hope to explore further the cellular interactions which endow specific function to networks of neurons.
Olfactory Pathways

magnified scene by clicking image
Fig. 1 WGA transgene method for selective labeling of neural pathways of interest
By using WGA cDNA as a transgene in combination with a neuron type-specific promotor element, anatomically-connected and functionally-related neural pathways can be clearly visualized with great accuracy and high reproducibility.

Systematic single-unit recordings, and more recently optical imaging of intrinsic signals1), by Mori and colleagues have established the functional organization of the olfactory bulb2). Identification of the 1000 gene repertoire of mammalian odorant receptors has further made this sensory system accessible to molecular analysis and manipulation. Sensory neurons expressing a given olfactory receptor converge their axons onto topographically fixed glomeruli in the target bulb and make synaptic contact with a specific set of principal neurons, mitral and tufted cells. The overriding mystery remains how such a precise wiring scheme can be established and maintained. The Laboratory for Neurobiology of Synapse (Y. Yoshihara, head) will continue to tackle this question in two ways. First, the ongoing identification of recognition molecules that may guide individual odorant receptor cell axons to specific glomerular targets will be expanded. To date, Yoshihara et al. have described several novel cell-adhesion molecules expressed in robust patterns within olfactory bulb (e.g. OCAM, BIG-1, telencephalin), as well as the rest of the brain2). Tissue culture and gene targeting in mice are clarifying their functional role in neurite outgrowth. A complementary approach using mutant screens in zebrafish will further characterize molecules underlying olfactory axon pathfinding. Second, an innovative anatomical tract-tracing technique pioneered by this laboratory aims to elucidate the multiple processing stages downstream of any given odorant receptor3). Cell type-specific promoters have been coupled to the gene encoding wheat-germ agglutinin (WGA) to successfully visualize neuronal circuits emanating from those source neurons in transgenic mice (Fig. 1). Trans-synaptic transport of WGA expressed in individual odorant receptor cells is expected to reveal the fine-tuning of connectivity through olfactory bulb and beyond into cortex during development and plasticity.

Visual Pathways
magnified scene by clicking image
Fig. 2 Diverse morphology (red, axons; black, dendrites) of inhibitory Inter neuron sub-types within cerebral cortex. Courtesy of Dr. Y. Kawaguchi (RIKEN & NIPS).
.Neuronal networks in the visual system remain obscure despite comparatively many years of study. An optimal excitatory-inhibitory balance within neocortex appears to determine receptive field properties such as size, orientation, or direction preference. The Laboratory for Neuronal Circuit Development (T.K. Hensch, head) has focused upon this changing balance during early postnatal life. They have demonstrated that the sensitivity to visual experience first described by Hubel and Wiesel over 40 years ago is driven by inhibition. Unlike wild-type animals, mice lacking a synaptic isoform of GABA-synthetic enzyme, GAD65, do not shift their cortical responsiveness in favor of the open eye when one eye is occluded4). Full ocular dominance plasticity is restored in an all-or-none fashion when GABAergic transmission is locally enhanced with benzodiazepines during the brief monocular deprivation. These results indicate that cortical microcircuits ミ rather than single synapses ミ detect the disparity between competing sensory inputs to instruct the expression of changes in both thalamocortical and intracortical connections. Identification of an animal model exhibiting a robust yet reversible disruption of plasticity in the intact visual cortex provides a valuable tool for dissecting the mechanisms underlying experience-dependent changes in the brain. Future work will focus on the rich diversity of inhibitory interneuron subtypes within neocortex to determine which circuit elements are especially important for plasticity in vivo (Fig. 2). Moreover, close collaboration with other institutes at RIKEN, such as the Genomic Sciences Center, promises to unravel the cascade of events that are triggered when plasticity is switched on by the appropriate excitatory-inhibitory balance.
Critical Periods for Neuronal Circuit Function
magnified scene by clicking image
Fig. 3 Neuronal circuits in developing visual cortex are shaped by experience during a limited time in early life. Prematurely raising cortical inhibition (blue arrow) or genetically maintaining a low level (red arrow) can advance or delay, respectively, onset of the critical period(yellow) for sensory plasticity.
Olfaction and vision represent two extremes with regard to sensory circuit refinement. Throughout life, axons must repeatedly navigate to their correct glomerular target as receptor cells turn over in the olfactory epithelium. Instead, right and left eye inputs into binocular visual cortex compete for space only once in life. What renders one system continually plastic, while the other is fixed in place? Understanding the basic mechanism of this dichotomy harbors one of the greatest contributions that basic neuroscience can make to society: how to appropriately nurture the brain.
The rescue of GAD65 mutants above was possible not only at the peak of the typical critical period for plasticity, but also later in adulthood5). Conversely, the onset of plasticity in visual cortex could be accelerated with diazepam in immature wild type animals. This represents the first example of direct control over the timing of a critical period, and inhibition holds the key (Fig. 3). Interestingly, GABAergic granule cells are continuously generated throughout life in the ever plastic olfactory bulb. In the second phase, we wish to incorporate the exploration of one other sensory pathway into our group. For example, it would be exciting to pursue inhibition and critical periods for circuit refinement in the auditory or somatosensory system. Such whole animal studies would eventually lead us back to cellular analyses. In particular, how do neurons react when inserted into small networks of a variable excitatory-inhibitory milieu? Or more specifically, what is the interaction between diverse types of inhibitory interneuron and what function (e.g. response synchronization, oscillation) does this impart onto the network as a whole? Clearly, a fourth team dedicated to the high-resolution study of local circuit behavior in vitro is also required.
In conclusion, then, we wish to encourage interested candidates in these two areas to apply for our generously funded positions by the March 15, 2001 deadline. As rigorously demonstrated for the cerebellum elsewhere at BSI, we now endeavor to understand how sensory neuron function emerges as a result of circuit integration. Monthly group meetings, close collaboration, and an active series of annual workshops here at RIKEN by a distinguished international panel of scientists will guide our quest. The first topic will be "Cellular interactions in neuronal networks" from April 3-5, 2001, featuring Y. Amitai, E. Buhl, E. Callaway, B. Connors, M. Kano, Y. Kawaguchi, A. Konnerth, T. Manabe, I. Mody, S. Nelson, M. Scanziani, R. Yuste, R. Wong. Wonユt you join us in Wako? (for further information: search14@brain.riken.go.jp)

<References>
1) Uchida, N., Takahashi, Y.K., Tanifuji, M., Mori, K. (2000) Odor maps in the mammalian olfactory bulb: domain organization and odorant structural features. Nat Neurosci. 3:1035-1043 2) Mori, K., Nagao, H., Yoshihara, Y. (1999) The olfactory bulb: coding and processing of odor molecule information. Science 286:711-715 3) Yoshihara, Y., Mizuno, T., Nakahira, M., Kawasaki, M., Watanabe, Y., Kagamiyama, H., Jishage, K., Ueda, O., Suzuki, H., Tabuchi, K., Sawamoto, K., Okano, H., Noda, T., Mori, K. (1999) A genetic approach to visualization of multisynaptic neural pathways using plant lectin transgene. Neuron 22:33-41 4) Hensch, T.K., Fagiolini, M., Mataga, N., Stryker, M.P., Baekkeskov, S., Kash, S.F. (1998) Local GABA circuit control of experience-dependent plasticity in developing visual cortex. Science 282:1504-1508 5) Fagiolini, M., Hensch, T.K. (2000) Inhibitory threshold for critical-period activation in primary visual cortex. Nature 404:183-186
RIKEN BSI NEWS

RIKEN BSI HOME
RIKEN Brain Science Institute (RIKEN BSI)
Copyright All Rights Reserved.